Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat, ripped Donald Trump for his military attack against Iran on Saturday, saying the move is “absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment.”

Ocasio-Cortez ripped the president’s action on X, formerly Twitter, and wrote, “The President’s disastrous decision to bomb Iran without authorization is a grave violation of the Constitution and Congressional War Powers. He has impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations. It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment.”

On the other hand, Senator John Fetterman, a Pennsylvania Democrat, came to Trump’s side and wrote on X, “As I’ve long maintained, this was the correct move by @POTUS. Iran is the world’s leading sponsor of terrorism and cannot have nuclear capabilities. I’m grateful for and salute the finest military in the world.”

  • PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Mussolini got dragged through the streets and him and his gf’s lifeless corpses were hung upside down for all of Rome to see.

    Weird fact. Not sure why I’m thinking of it

  • StonerCowboy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Keep screaming impeachment when clearly that doesn’t work…he belongs in jail ya know for being a 34 count felon rapist seditionous traitor.

  • Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I like how they pretend if he is not the president it wouldn’t be the same. They lied about WMD in Iraq and went to war in behalf of israel. And the did regime change in Libya, bomb and missions in Somalia and Yemen and not a single word from almost all congress about war crimes in gaza.

    Let’s be honest, AIPAC controls all level of governments.

    The only issue now, white MAGA, who actually hate Jew, or Russian propagandist are calling him out.

    As soon as AIPAC find dirt on them or manage to buy them, the progressive movement will find themselves alone again.

    • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It wouldn’t. Trump can be bought off more easily. Trump literally released a propaganda AI hit piece on Gaza for Israel. Trump is literally illegally detaining protesters for protesting against Israel in universities. People who say Biden would have done the same show how clueless they are, specially now that the differences have shown how stark they are.

      WMD in Iraq? Literally Republicans again.

      Libya? Literally United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973. Is the organization constantly getting vilified by Israel by their condemnations of it also part of the same grand scheme in your world view?

      Somalia? Another Republican president.

      Your shotgun argumentation is bad and you should feel bad. AIPAC has a lot of power in the US, but it is not equally present in both parties and it does not manifest in the same way either. The US has bigger problems than AIPAC, but its fascist takeover has probably gone over your head as well.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yeah you figured out the big secret. The Jews are the secret puppet masters of the world!

      That or you’ve become antisemitic. Yeah, that’s probably it.

      • Doorbook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        It is you who think when someone says AIPAC means Jew. Most Jew has nothing to do with AIPAC. Read more about Zionism and their history before and after WWII and read more about different mostly Jew who are on odd with the AIPAC and it’s Zionist views…

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    12 hours ago

    One of like 1000 things he’s done in the last few months that was either illegal, unconstitutional, “grounds for impeachment”, or corrupt. 🥱

    • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      What are the 999 things he’s done that are illegal, unconstitutional, corrupt or grounds for impeachment in the last few months?

      Seriously, one would think with a file that big, collectivists would have reacted in some way, wouldn’t they?

      • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Just an FYI, there is a tracker of current legal cases against the trump admin (over 280 right now), and this doesn’t include much of the daily illegal stuff he does (like this recent attack on another country).

        The tracker also doesn’t cover stuff like his scam phone, scam crypto, scam <insert any of the stuff he’s selling>, threats of annexation of other countries, using the white house to sell teslas, arresting people he dislikes, and so on.

        There’s probably more than a 1000, now that I think about it. And this is all just from the beginning of the year. If you include his previous term, you could easily add a few hundred more. 🫢

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Kendrick Lamar “It’s not enough.” I want him removed and charged for all the harm and civil rights violations and war crimes. No President has ever been held accountable, So you can start with him.

    • Maeve@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Nixon was. They could have impeached Clinton for Bosnia, but went with lying about adultery.

      • wpb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        They could have impeached Clinton for Bosnia

        Why? Forgive my ignorance, balkan history is hard.

        • Maeve@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          He violated both UN and NATO charters, iirc. Imo, intervention was necessary, because the Serbs were ethnically cleansing the Croats and Muslims, and Western Europe was dragging feet, but he violated the law and badly mishandled the intervention.

          • wpb@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I don’t know for certain, but I think you might be mixing up Kosovo and Bosnia. Because I know he illegally (by international law) bombed Yugoslavia for the Kossovar Albanians (which some argue hastened and exacerbated the ethnic cleansing of the Albanians, which aligns quite well with the timeline, especially considering there was a concrete diplomatic alternatice proposed by both sides), but he got approval for this. Famously, Bernie Sanders voted in favor. So while it should earn him a trip to the Hague, he didn’t violate any domestic laws that I’m aware of.

            But again, Yugoslavia in the 90s is crazy complicated, and there’s so much I don’t know, so maybe I’m just completely wrong here.

            • Maeve@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Maybe, I could have sworn it was Bosnia, and I can’t really research it right now. I have a project to prepare for and settle into, my apologies if I’m wrong.

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    No impeachments until they know they can get a conviction in the Senate, which is highly unlikely.

    Besides, an impeachment only makes Peter Theil (Vance’s leash holder) the president, then we’re out of the frying pan and into the fire.

  • flandish@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    21 hours ago

    he’s been impeached. what’s another one gonna do except distract everyone while he continues to war?

    • Absaroka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      IMO this is business as usual thinking.

      The left needs to push for a vote to get Congress on the record where they stand.

      And even if it doesn’t pass, getting some Republicans to vote yes would be a big win and a first step towards checking TACO.

    • Sc00ter@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      If the senate actually has balls, they can remove him from office. Impeachment doesnt inherently carry consequences. The senate determines consequence

      The first two times were like a jury declaring a person guilty, and then the judge came in for sentences and said, “eh but did he really do it? I sentence you to… no punishment.”

      • Photuris@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        20 hours ago

        The reason (well, one of the reasons) they don’t do it, is because Trump ignores orders. Meaning: if they want to remove him from office, it would literally come down to sending goons in to physically remove him, and the other goons might resist. It would get ugly.

        • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          20 hours ago

          No, the reason was Reds protecting their guy and refusing to hold him to account. Even if what you suggested were part of their motivation, the optics of Trump refusing accountability and literally being dragged out, hasn’t been paying attention to the optics that Trump himself brings to the US and the GOP, specifically. It’s a pretty shit justification.

        • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          20 hours ago

          The moment they decide he’s removed, he has no authority to stop them from removing him. Sec Serv wouldn’t listen to him. He’d be an 80 year old man hiding behind a door.

        • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Um, *raises hand* point of parliamentary procedure; people are suffering and quite literally dying right now. It’s already extremely ugly.

          • Photuris@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            20 hours ago

            Yes, but most Democrats in congress are feckless cowards. They don’t want to be seen “instigating” something ugly.

            Instead, they’ll give speeches, hold up plaquards, and write firmly-worded letters.

            And the Republicans are complicit, so.

      • msprout@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The older I get, the more I feel like the Senate is essentially the means through which corporations and the capital class defeat any popular movement. Our Constitution was written mostly by drunk, privileged, rich kids. I think sometimes you can really smell the disdain for lower classes in the way everything is built.

      • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        The first two times were like a jury declaring a person guilty, and then the judge came in for sentences and said, “eh but did he really do it? I sentence you to… no punishment.”

        Not quite. The first two times were like a grand jury returning an indictment. That’s the House’s part of the equation. They have a vote requiring 50% of members to vote to impeach the president, effectively indicting him. The Senate then has to hold a trial that which takes a 67% vote to convict him and remove him from office.

        Saying he has been impeached twice but not removed from office is the equivalent of saying someone has been indicted twice but not convicted. He hasn’t yet been convicted.

  • crusa187@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Israel is quite literally the world’s biggest terrorist nation state. The paper thin transparent spin tactics of Israel’s defenders would be amusing if the results of its terrorism wasn’t so horrifying.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    22 hours ago

    It will never happen. Instead, thousands will die (mostly innocents) and Americans will never get healthcare. EU will be a good lapdog and lick USA’s balls asking for more.

    I hate this timeline.

    If I were Iran right now sitting on (mostly destroyed) stockpiles of enriched uranium which can’t easily be turned into weapons-grade, I would be organizing dirty bombs going off in every world capital I could get agents inside.

    Make no mistake, US and EU will be paying for this decision for decades to come, and we will deserve everything we get. May some god have mercy on our souls, because our owner class will not.

    • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Sorry but EU is neither a lapdog nor responsible for the disaster you voted for. We aren’t really asking for much these days, either. Business is good and new deals with China are boosting the economy.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      “He’s guilty of crimes. He should be prosecuted for those crimes.”

      “You stupid idiot leftists. Don’t you realize opposing rich people never works? Just brown nose them so you can become one somebody. That’s the real ticket.”

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        There are twice as many NFL players on their standard rosters than there are billionaires in the U.S.

        Mathematically the ~850 billionaires make up 0.00025% of the population.

        The average person is about 22 times more likely to get struck by lightning than to become a billionaire.

        There’s a lot of people trying that brown nosing tactic, yet don’t realize there isn’t room on the roster for infinite members, there is a fairly finite amount of funds, and for someone to move up, the money has to come from others. Roughly the net worth of 5,000 U.S. families given to one person. But in reality, the devaluing of wealth from near every individual in the U.S. so they can have it.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        You make progress by fighting the battles you can win. Fighting battles you can’t win is all about getting attention and accomplishing nothing.

  • Kamikaze Rusher@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I don’t disagree that bombing Iran puts us at risk of starting a war we don’t want to be involved in. However I think the public is too split on the matter to put majority support behind impeachment.

    Conservative circles themselves appear divided with some saying the display of force was necessary and avoided direct conflict (minimizing operational costs), some saying the President is authorized to conduct these actions under the War Powers Resolution of 1973, and some voicing dissent or disapproval altogether of this action.

    The War Powers Resolution will probably be the loophole that conservative outlets use to claim that Trump has done nothing wrong. I don’t know if there’s been an exercise of this authority without congressional approval that has lead to the targeted country declaring war as a result. If this were to happen, maybe there will be clear grounds to impeach, but I don’t think the public will display a majority support for it to happen.

    • Kühlschrank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I agree that for practical purposes there is not the support for impeachment. But I do think that every unconstitutional thing he does should be called out with the simple but direct message that ‘impeachment and removal is the only remedy to a corrupt and unconstitutional POTUS’. We should say that over and over and over so that takes on its own meaning and the public is ready for it when sentiment inevitably brings us to the point it is actually possible.