• TheFonz@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I will stop participating in liberal democracy. I will stop voting for any of the candidates because they all contribute to the status quo.

    Please. Tell me: what ought we do? Do you have a roadmap or an effective strategy to achieve anything? I’d really like to know if there’s a better way. I’m here to learn.

    What ought we do to achieve any of the goals of the left?

    Thanks! <3

      • TheFonz@lemmy.worldBanned from community
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I’m well familiar with anarchist theory. One of my best professors in college was heavily into anarchist philosophy and we’ve had many in depth conversations. I don’t want to sit around and do high brow discourse. I want concrete actionable plans. What’s the plan?

          • TheFonz@lemmy.worldBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Again, these are all nice in theory. I love councils. I love cooperatives. Where’s the practice, though? I need more. I need a concrete actionable plan. Not high level discussion of structure. Not more conversations about frameworks. I need a plan. I’m a hands on learner.

            Also, none of this is mutually exclusive with harm reduction. You can work towards building a classless, stateless society etc while also reducing harm in the now. They are not at odds and anyone that says otherwise is talking from privilege in my opinion.

            • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Where’s the practice, though?

              These are the practice! Join/Start cooperatives. Join/Start worker’s unions!. Join/Start neighborhood communes and so on! Anarchism is all about action right now!

              Also, none of this is mutually exclusive with harm reduction.

              First of all, elections are not “harm reduction”. Actual harm reduction is actually doing what I wrote above.

              Second of all, yes it is. You cannot put your effort into direct action for mutual aid, AND waste your time electioneering as well.

              • TheFonz@lemmy.worldBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                I agree that building more coops and councils is a good start. I do want us to be politically effective too, though. When I say “politically”, I’m not talking about electioneering or participating in liberal democracy. I’m talking abeut building power. Expanding the message. Growing coalitions. Growing the movement. That can’t be done if all were focused on is endless gatekeeping and purity testing 24/7.

                For example: I’m having another conversation with someone else in this thread and all they’re fixated on is labels and tags. No thoughtful discussion about strategy. And this is my main frustration with the cause (not you in particular): If we spent 1% of the energy we do gatekeeping and alienating everyone on actual meaningful implementation the world would have turned into an anarchist utopia decades ago. Also, I disagree that taking one day to cast a vote ballot is asking too much. We can walk and chew gum at the same time. If casting a vote helps my Latino or Vietnamese brothers from landing in an ICE detention facility I’ll do that while also campaigning and inviting more people to join the anarchist movement. It doesn’t have to be one or the other.

                Thanks for listening to my Ted talk, I’m done.

                • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 days ago

                  I agree that building more coops and councils is a good start. I do want us to be politically effective too, though. When I say “politically”, I’m not talking about electioneering or participating in liberal democracy. I’m talking abeut building power. Expanding the message. Growing coalitions. Growing the movement. That can’t be done if all were focused on is endless gatekeeping and purity testing 24/7.

                  All that is done naturally by taking part in horizontal orgs.

                  Also, I disagree that taking one day to cast a vote ballot is asking too much.

                  Then you’re missing the forest for the trees. Elections is not “one day to cast a vote”, it’s years long process wasting millions of volunteer work hours, mental health and goodwill.

                  But you response shows me you were just wasting my time. You weren’t trying to learn, you were trying to prove a point to some imaginary audience.

  • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    But have you considered that a system that leads to fascism is still better than actually manifested fascism?? And yea, maybe we should fix it before it gets there, but if it can’t be fixed with voting now then we should have voted harder before, and vote harder next time

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      As a soc dem, capitalism is only slightly better but the system needs heavy regulations. But with the burgeoning AI and automation, I am starting to lean more towards socialism. I mean, after AI “companies” stole our data to train their AI with, isn’t it only right that WE should actually take rightful ownership of that? At some point, AI and automation will become advanced enough that most jobs will be gone and humans would not be needed anymore. When that time comes, the ordinary folks should take their rightful stake in that automation revolution by taxing robots or take communal ownership of AI to fund universal basic income and services. That is the best socialism we can get. Not only we can finally rid of social ails that plague humanity due to unbridled capitalism, but also we are taking away full power from oligarchs who stole our own data to begin with. They would not be there if it weren’t for us to begin with.

        • wpb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          … if you’re dead set on maintaining a liberal democracy, where “maintaining” refers to what you’re seeing in the US with Trump right now. Also, it’s not restricted to two party systems. Look at Europe.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Nah, I mean literally the US without some kind of revolution. States aren’t THAT separate in the US.

    • the_q@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Voting gives the illusion of choice and power. If it really made a difference we wouldn’t be allowed to do it.

      • Doom@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Voting gives choice and power. If it didn’t make a difference they wouldn’t try to stop you from voting

        Roger Stone got Bush elected by swarming a court house

        Trump has harassed the authenticity of voting, voting laws and registration rolls to prevent people from voting.

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          liberal is center right; and liberalism completely fine with authority, maybe less with authoritarianism per se, but that’s what the “inevitably leads to” part is about. an anti-authoritarian but pro-authority stance will inevitably lead to authoritarianism. just like how cops and military keep getting more and more ridiculous funding despite not demonstrating anything of worth that they contribute to society.

  • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    What a naive and simplistic view. The people who think this have never lived in a country with an unstable government. Not everybody wants to join a revolution. Some people just want to live their life.

    • lath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Talk about naive…

      Let’s say you or someone you care about (other than yourself that is) is in an accident of some kind and while laying down dying, someone passes by. They take a look and say “Not everybody wants to save others. Some people just want to live their life.”, then walk away.

      Wouldn’t you feel even a shred of anger at the indifference? Or maybe want some kind of retribution to befall this kind of cruelty? After all, had they acted, you or your loved one might have been saved.

      We’re emotional creatures. That’s why, not helping is the same as hurting. So when you choose to stand aside, you actually choose to harm.

      • rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        OP wasn’t suggesting helping people, but calling liberals a death cult for not overthrowing a Capitalist system.

        So more like, you see that person on the side of the road, you help them, and the OP says “how dare you spend your time helping that one individual while living in a society that exploits people globally”.

        I don’t think OP really meant that but it was low effort bait for fake internet points.

      • rocket_dragon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Yeah and there were a lot of quiet heroes in Germany who did small-scale acts of rebellion and saved a lot of lives by hiding people and helping them escape.

        There’s a lot of quiet libs doing small acts of rebellion hiding immigrants or escorting people to get abortion or providing plan b.

        I feel like some of you “revolutionaries” have lost the plot, like the revolution only matters if it’s big and cinematic. I think you’ve made it more about your ego and internal revolution LARP than actually helping people.

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Exactly this, I never said I wouldn’t help people hide, or give out information to ICE or any other dickheads who are looking for legal immigrants to deport. Just bcz I dont want to pick up a gun and run around shooting people doesn’t mean i dont care.

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            lol who said anything about “pick up a gun and run around shooting people”. Y’all are erecting some mighty tall strawmen.

  • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Liberal *slower death cult.

    “Guys guys, lets work for the slow death instead of the fast death.”

    Gives similar vibes to “capitalism is the least bad system”

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    If you could have voted, didn’t vote for Harris, and aren’t actively out in the streets hucking bricks at ICE and trumpers, then I have no respect for you.

    You played the game and you played to lose. You played to lose when we had everything to lose, and nothing to gain. You made the 4th worst choice I can think of in the last 30 years.

    • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      13 days ago

      Perfect example of the lib thinking that just voting means they actually did something so they don’t have to do any direct action. Which is of course why your country inevitably goes to shit.

      • Muad'dib@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Bytemeister didn’t say they don’t have to do any direct action. You made that up out of nothing.

        You have to do both. That’s what Bytemeister is saying. If you didn’t vote, and you’re not actively in rebellion, then claiming you’re the side who does direct action is an obvious lie. And they’re right, you are lying. You’re tanking our chances of overthrowing the government through revolution.

        • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          if not (voted for Harris) and not (actively out in the streets)

          then (no respect for you)

          And requires that both conditions are true. So if you voted for Harris, then at most one condition is true, and Bytemeister’s respect for you remains at its current level.

          • Muad'dib@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 days ago

            Yeah, if you voted for Harris, then you’re not actively fucking up the revolution by making the secret police bolder, so you don’t have to make up for it by hucking bricks at ICE. You’ve proven that you have the long term thinking required to participate in organisation through safer methods like unionising, rallying, helping organise, weapons training, and recruiting.

            But if someone didn’t vote for bullshit reasons, they let Trump escalate the ICE deportations and concentration camps. They made things harder for the revolution. They’re not a useful member and they should go remove themself from the situation with a glorious final stand.

            • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              Lol revolutions have happened in far worse political climates than Trump. You’re delusional if you think a worsening social situation makes revolutions less likely or “fucking up”.

              As the person you’re replying to said, the original argument made is that it’s enough to vote to maintain their respect. Therefore they’re not doing anything else.

              Now fuck off from anarchist spaces with your moralizing about useless electoralism. You have the rest of lemmy for that shite.

              • Muad'dib@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                Your post is moralising about electoralism. It’s just moralising against electoralism. And it’s a useless waste of my and other anarchists’ time. Infighting over pointless bullshit instead of talking about direct action. Complaining about the anarchists who do things you don’t like one day a year isn’t getting us any closer to a revolution.

                • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 days ago

                  Electoralism isn’t about 1 day a year. There’s immense amount of volunteer resources and time wasted on this farce in the previous years. And the more we pretend electoralism is useful, the more justified they feel in wasting those resources.

                  And my post is just a meme. You don’t have to “waste your time” on it.

    • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      Shouldn’t you be spending your gaslighting budget on your fellow liberals who actually understand what the term genocide means, liberal?

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        It’s not gaslighting if it’s the truth.

        By voting (or just not voting) you participated in the system. If you want to be against the system, then you need to overthrow it.

        You played to lose, which was dumb, and you played to lose when there was nothing to gain, and everything to lose (which is even more dumb). If you aren’t burning shit, then you never actually cared enough to be against it, you’re an apathetic asshole who squandered their only voice to say “I don’t care if the facists win, Kamala isn’t perfect and I can’t stand that”. You may not have voted for trump, but you sure as fuck voted for all of this. I have no respect for the people that lack neither the intelligence to make the right decisions, nor the conviction to live with the consequences of making the wrong one.

        • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          It’s not gaslighting if it’s the truth.

          So you admit to gaslighting, then. Plus one for honesty, I guess.

          By voting (or just not voting) you participated in the system.

          Soooo… neither participating nor not participating means anything - is that correct?

          and everything to lose

          LOL! Lose what, genius? Did you really think that glorified pig was going to actually protect you from the fascists? I guess you don’t understand why the libs institutionalised that very thing we call “fascism” today in the first place, huh?

          Wake the fuck up.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            By voting (or just not voting) you participated in the system.

            Soooo… neither participating nor not participating means anything - is that correct?

            Couldn’t be more wrong. You are either playing to win, not playing to win, or not playing. In a 2 party system, a non-vote is the same decision as a vote. If you want to not play, then you need to be hostile to the system.

            LOL! Lose what, genius?

            Well, let’s see… My grandparents Medicare, my LGBTQ friends and family members rights, retirement savings, what little healthcare we actually had before, literally climate and the ability to live at or near the equator and coasts… Didn’t even have to google any of that. I guess if you want the full list, you can read project 2025, and the also draw conclusions from related activities. Oh, vaccine availability and herd immunity. 1st Amendment rights. Habeas corpus just to tack on a few more there.

            You wake the fuck up and look and the fucking mess you made because a perfect person wasn’t put up against Orange Hitler.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              Well, let’s see… My grandparents Medicare, my LGBTQ friends and family members rights, retirement savings, what little healthcare we actually had before, literally climate and the ability to live at or near the equator and coasts… Didn’t even have to google any of that. I guess if you want the full list, you can read project 2025, and the also draw conclusions from related activities. Oh, vaccine availability and herd immunity. 1st Amendment rights. Habeas corpus just to tack on a few more there.

              But why worry about that when you can decry THE LIBS for trying to avert catastrophe? Don’t the LIBS know that just averting catastrophe won’t bring about utopia?

            • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              You are either playing to win

              Win what, liberal? Four more years of liberals doing absolutely everything in their power to make life easier for fascists?

              Well, let’s see…

              Oh… you mean those things your precious liberal racketeers haven’t lifted a finger to protect in any way whatsoever? Do tell, genius - what did your “good cop” overlords do when the fascists took away Roe vs. Wade? What did they do when Trump sicced a white supremacist lynch mob on the US capitol?

              Except tell you to “vote harder,” that is?

              Again… wake the fuck up.

              • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                Your plan is working so well right now!

                Palestine is doing great! Economy has never been better and inflation is under control! People aren’t being rounded up and sent to extra-national torture prisons without a trial. The world you’ve heralded in is just doing so fucking great!

                • masquenox@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Palestine is doing great!

                  About that… how is that lie - oops, sorry, I meant to say “prediction your ilk peddled” - that Trump was going to be (supposedly) “worse” for Palestine turn out?

                  Your liberal-funded genocide - which the people you voted for enabled, of course - now looks pretty much the exact same as it did under Genocide Joe.

                  Do tell… will you be peddling this same lie again in four years’ time?

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            Sorry, couldn’t answer your question because I don’t live in an alternate reality where trump didn’t win. Maybe ask some of the other people here?

                • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 days ago

                  “You see we need to keep the Gastapo, parliament passed it so why stop it?”

                  I understand Harris can’t write bills as president, you dingus. A president has sway over their party. What Biden wanted, Dems pushed. What Trump wants, Republicans demand.

                  If Harris, a brown woman said “Hey ICE is a racist police organization made post-9/11 to go after brown people, let’s push to get rid of it” that would spark movement in Congress.

          • Clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            No cages is obviously the ideal case. Fewer cages is obviously better than more cages, which was the choice at the polls.

            “I don’t believe in voting” fine, enjoy the more cages option.

  • VampirePenguin@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    Participating in democracy doesn’t lead to fascism, capitalism does. Protest non-voters are idiots that gave away the one best power our system offers. Congratulations on your new fascist overlords, dummies. Anarchism is about power to the people and power to communities, you vote for the best thing for your community regardless of your personal feelings. Do I wish there was a better candidate than Kamala Harris? Hell yeah I do, but she is lightyears better than Trump for my people so she got my vote. You have to start where you are, not in some fantasy land where leftists have a viable alternative. You want change? Go find a milquetoast liberal running uncontested and primary against them. Ask hard questions and make them accountable. Sitting on your high horse while the world burns is not only useless, but an insult to the people who are actually suffering because of your choices. Fuck off.

    • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Anarchism is about power to the people and power to communities, you vote for the best thing for your community regardless of your personal feelings

      Yes, we anarchists famously believe that liberation from repressive structures can be achieved first-and-foremost through voting.

      I get that this is your perspective, but I think you’ve missed the point of anarchism if this is what you think it entails.

      • VampirePenguin@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        My perspective is that you fight on ALL fronts and you don’t leave power on the table for fascists to grab just because it doesn’t fit in with your revolution fantasy narrative to do so. I never said nor implied that voting is enough. It isn’t. But it is a simple way to keep dangerous people away from power.

        • anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          13 days ago

          That’s dandy, but that’s not an anarchist perspective. Fascism arises from capitalism under threat - if you’re not ready to defend yourself against the state abusing it’s monopoly on violence, then you’re not an anarchist.

          The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Yes, “inevitably.” What the fuck do you think is going to happen when one side is “A declining status quo that we refuse to fix as it gets worse and worse,” and the other is, “Let’s see what’s behind door #2! (hint: It’s fascism!)”

      Inevitably people will grow dissatisfied with the status quo, and look for any alternative. Inevitably. 100% chance. What part of that is so hard to understand?

      • andybytes@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        This is actually how it goes. Capitalism in Decline leads to some kind of fascism. Just think in terms of the interest of the capitalist class and how they guide the herd. Liberals are neoliberals and neoliberals are fascist. America is an imperialist, empire, and Nazis are the useful idiots of empire. You know, you could look at it like the Imperial Boomerang. It’s not like we’ve changed. It’s just the veil’s been removed and the ruling elite is dealing with blowback as they continue to march forward towards their selfish goals. We are just keeping it real nowadays, living in the world of the lowest common denominator. First world nations usually turn towards fascism while countries that are more collectivist culturally turn to socialism. And we gotta go fash to the extreme before eventually anything changes because the herd does not recognize what they’re stepping into. The herd does not know where it came from, where it’s going, so it’s only through collective suffering that anything will ever change, and it might even take a lifetime.

      • Kickforce@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        So if “the status quo” inevitably leads to fascism, the only way to avoid fascism would be a society that is in constant change? Well, for one thing, every society is in constant change unless you install some kind of religious dogmatic dictatorship, and even those break after some time under the stress of sociological pressures.

        Fascism, or things very much like it, happen whenever you let fear mongering powerhungry fools who deny reality in favor of some kind of nostalgia infused “greater” image of your society get away with their bullshit.

        Human leadership leads to fascism at some point, because humans love their fears and their tribal behavior.

        • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Society is constantly changing, yes. The problem is our institutions have not kept up.

          A given institution (or complex of institutions) incentivize a certain set of behaviors. Not everyone adopts those behaviors, but enough do that the effect accumulates. Eventually something will break, some set of behavioral interactions start negatively interacting with the system (like, say, a for-profit healthcare system that incentivizes not treating the sick and wounded).

          In a functioning system, this would be where you study what happened, and use what you’ve learned about the problem to try adapt the institution. This will create a new set of incentives for a new set of behaviors… and inevitably a new problem will grow out of it and the process starts over again.

          I can’t speak for other places, but in the US that is very much NOT what happens. Our status quo is stagnant. We’ve had the same problems for decades now. That is what creates fertile ground for fascism - when the guy saying, “We’ll burn the rot and go back to when it was better” sounds more appealing than, “Nothing will fundamentally change”.

    • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      Fascists are bad, they don’t listen to criticism.

      Liberals are less bad, and claim to listen to criticism.

      So why not try to criticize the people who are “fighting” Trump for better plans and actions? One person alone has a good idea but not a great execution. Gathering an idea and people to fight for it is worth doing.

      Plus if you think no one here is calling out fascists, you’re hella ignorant and blind. We call out the people who enable and slow roll fascists. We can blame Biden for not arresting Trump because he wanted two wins in a roll.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Because the better plan has historically always led to a failed state and all of our enemes are cheering it on.

        When Anarchists and Tankies are capitalising on a situation the outcomes are as predictable as the Trump Agenda.

        • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Yeah. If we had all just fallen in line president delacruz would be fixing shit right now. She was electable if these fucking anarchists would have voted for her!

            • Kickforce@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 days ago

              Pah, Greek democracy was interesting, but very limited given how narrow their Deimos was with women, foreign residents and slaves not counting.

            • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              Yes really, it was considered a failure despite those well-documented centuries.

              “Hence it is that such democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths.”

              — James Madison, Federalist Papers 10 & 51

        • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          13 days ago

          historically always led to a failed state

          Failed state (USSR) is when you turn a feudal backwater country (Russian Empire) with a life expectancy of 28 years into the second world industrial power within 50 years and provide universal free healthcare, education, pensions for retirement, eliminate unemployment and homelessness, and you don’t exploit the resources and labour of the global south. Oh, and you save Europe from Nazism, which is what this post was originally about.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            In this hypothetical also get to starve millions of people to death and your legacy gets to be sending out late night death squads to kill dissenters. Well, not you. You would never be in charge. You will never be Joseph Stalin, somebody else will be and you will suffer with the rest of the peasants.

            • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              Millions of people routinely starved in pre-Soviet Russia and you don’t seem to have a problem with it. Soviets ended hunger after WW2 through the mechanisation of agriculture, as all countries which eliminated hunger did. Suffering famines during civil wars, during Nazi invasion of your territory, and during mass collectivisation processes, isn’t exclusive to the Soviet Union, it’s a rather common thing in preindustrial societies as the Soviet Union was at that time. That’s in opposition to England murdering many millions more of Indians in the Bengal famine during WW2 by purposefully extracting essentially all food from some regions of India.

              your legacy gets to be sending out late night death squads to kill dissenters

              Thats just, like, your opinion, dude. The legacy of the Soviet Union (a project much greater than a single man who was president for less than 3 decades of the project) saved Europe from Nazism (saving tens if not hundreds of millions of lives in the process), industrialised 300 million people without abusing colonialism and extraction of resources and labour from the global south, rose life expectancy from 28 years to 70, guaranteed free education to the highest level to all women and men of the country, produced the lowest historically recorded levels of inequality in the region, and eliminated homelessness and unemployment.

              Stop swallowing and spreading western anticommunist propaganda, the evil is the western empire oppressing billions in the global south, not a country that suffered famines during land collectivisation.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                No that’s not accurate. Centralized agricultural planning in pre-soviet Russia was still better than what the Soviets implemented, this was all very well documented that more people died as a result of the changes made.

                • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Centralized agricultural planning in pre-soviet Russia was still better than what the Soviets implemented

                  Life expectancy was 28 years old before the Bolsheviks, after the land reforms and WW2 life expectancy rose dramatically to 60, what on Earth are you talking about

    • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Hey, remember all the time the blues defended red team by taking all the momentum, monopolizing possibility, and then just throwing as hard as they possibly could at the last second, up to and including surrendering a presidemtial election that they won?

      Remember when they murdered the concept of hope for my entire generation?

      If you didn’t vote delacruz, you clearly didn’t take this electoralism stuff seriously.

    • Signtist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      We’re well past identifying the source of the problem. If aliens invaded and everyone was debating how best to fight back, you’d be sitting there saying “Why is nobody blaming the aliens!?” Everyone who would understand that the country is falling into fascism already does. Anyone who doesn’t simply hasn’t yet admitted that they like fascism.

      Yes, fascists exist, and are to blame for a large chunk of the failures of society. Now is the time to figure out who’s going to help fight against them in a way that keeps them away for as long as possible, and who’s going to claim that they had some good points, setting the stage for their expedited return.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Alright but you’re also additionally alienating the party who majority aligns with your supposed policy stances as well as the people who vote for them, unless you dislike accountability, democracy, and worker solidarity.

        • ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago

          Devotion to capitalism and the status quo will certainly complicate forming a unified front based around against changing the economic system.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            I’ve yet to converse with somebody who has any realistic plan to do away with capitalism unless their definition of capitalism is “western nation”.

            Let’s just tax the rich and regulate the markets.

            • meowMix2525@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              And what’s your plan to get that done? What, you’re going to convince wealthy politicians to give you those things, and piss off their donors, just out of the goodness of their hearts? What about when they don’t do that, are you going to find your backbone and criticize them directly instead of turning all of your vitriol to the left of you?

              No, of course not. Your plan is to vote harder and throw up your hands when the things we desperately need as a class are explicitly left off the table; spoiling the vote, btw; because the things that would really get people out to vote, across party lines, just happen to be things that go against the interests of the ruling class. Then you’ll shout at the rest of us for “dividing the left” when we point out the fucking obvious that those who derive power from capital are not going to give up that power voluntarily and the whole thing was smoke and mirrors to keep you invested in the system that affords them that power.

              We as a class will need to organize and build class consciousness so that we can pull our collective power together and use it to force the hand of the ruling class. That’s what a realistic plan looks like. That is the only way meaningful change has ever been wrought about in this country.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                13 days ago

                Fair democracy with an educated populace to minimize all human suffering and avert maximum harm.

                Don’t like wealth hoarders? Tax them.

                Don’t like shady businesses? Regulate them.

                If something needs to be overthrown it’s a wannabe despot, not the concept of goods traded for legal tender. Constant progress has occured for hundreds of years. Theres hardly ever a time in the past better than this decade in the USA.

    • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Have all the western countries that have had rising fascist dictatorship movements in the past few years come about through some other unrelated means?

      • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        We’re clearly in a trend of rising authoritarianism, but that doesn’t mean it’s inevitable. Such waves have receded in the past and they likely will again.

        I just don’t like these inevitability narratives because they deprive people of agency in shaping society. Sure, maybe liberalism has a tendency to creep towards fascism, at least under some conditions. But this happens through the actions of the people that make up those societies and it can be resisted.

        • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          The last waves of fascism this advanced in America were in the 1930s. Throughout the latter half of the 20th century outright Nazis were generally associated with skinheads and were almost universally hated by mainstream culture. There are now actual Nazi movements in control of western nations. And even where they aren’t, they are winning over sizable percentages of the population.

          This isnt going to pass as easily as you seem to think. Genocide has been live streamed around the world for almost 2 years and resistance to it has been relatively minor in terms of what you would actually expect. White western Christians (men especially) are actually mostly very down with white supremacy and neofascism. It benefits them specifically. And they represent the largest voting block in most western nations.

          Liberalism could have prevented this by preventing Nazis from ever coming into positions of economic / cultural / political power in the first place. Liberalism is primarily concerned with countering revolutionary politics, moreso even than preventing fascist uprisings. It’s more important to them that pro capitalist values are the dominant ones in politics and culture than whether anti fascist values are. The ruling class almost entirely stands to benefit either way, they’re ambivalent towards fascism.

          • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 days ago

            I didn’t say it would be easy, just that fascism is not inevitable.

            Can you elaborate on how liberalism could have prevented this? This seems in contradiction to your overall point that fascism is inevitable under liberal governments.

            • LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              13 days ago

              Support working class politics. Support public ownership. Essentially, become a working class state. Outlaw fascist rhetoric. Redistribute wealth from billionaires to the working class. The main reason that fascist media organizations exist is because billionaires do. They wouldn’t be able to mass indoctrinate if they did not have essentially boundless economic power. Fascists won in Germany and America both because of media dominance and manipulation of the western liberal political system. In very comparable ways honestly.

              The German democracy failed to respond in any way to the rise of the fascists. The only political party attempting any actual resistance of the fascists was the communists. The conservative and liberal parties were more interested in combating the communists than they were about combating the fascists. It was more important to them that the institutions of capital remains unaffected than fascism being stopped. They could have never let Hitler step foot out of a jail cell again. They honestly could’ve shot him, and a fair number of his nazi party upper echelon. People were calling for it, literally. Most people believe that Hitler mass indoctrinated all of Germany and won a landslide election and from there dismantled German democracy. That actually isnt true though. The final fair and democratic elections in Weimar Germany resulted in an extremely slim victory for the Nazi party. The communists were very close behind them. And in turn were conservatives and social democrats close behind the communists. On the whole, the majority of the nation voted for other parties. Once a bad actor was chancellor, all he had to do was find an excuse to enact emergency powers. He was handed the best possible opportunity on a silver platter by a young communist who was doing his part to fight back. If only others had followed his example, maybe history wouldve ended differently. As it was, Hitler enacted emergency powers to suspend all civil liberties in Germany. He banned the communists from any political organization and started literally rounding up communists and communist politicians and putting them in concentration camps. This was in 1933. The first camps were for communists. Then when Hindenburg died a short while later there was literally nothing standing between him and pure absolute dictatorship.

              He could’ve been stopped at many points if liberal democracy was an ideology that prioritized the rights of the working class. If they had had an aim whatsoever of stopping fascism, it was preventable. Much like the democratic party though, their primary aims were to protect the ruling class of capitalists and the institutions that allow them to steal working class labor.

              • AES_Enjoyer@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                Support working class politics. Support public ownership. Essentially, become a working class state. Outlaw fascist rhetoric. Redistribute wealth from billionaires to the working class

                Literally all of this is in opposition to liberalism, there’s a reason why the trend is the opposite in quite literally all liberal democracies

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      The fence is very squarely with medical for all, free education, democracy, and taxing the rich while the other side is about a mile away from the fence in 1930s Germany, so…

      • stray@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        13 days ago

        If the Democrats were willing and capable of getting Americans things like universal healthcare, why didn’t they do it while they were in power?

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Democrats haven’t had 60 senators since 1979. They had 58 in 2010 for exactly 72 days and tried to pass public option healthcare but only 1 independent voted with them so they settled for the lesser medicaid expansion that the current Republicans are gutting in the budget. For the record, that medicaid expansion passed with supermajority as every singe Republican voted nay.