• Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      in 3 days

      Musk is going to be PISSED when he finds out there is no bureau of physics he can subsume or destroy from within. I believe one Rush Stockton came to a similar conclusion, if he indeed had time for that conclusion to even form before perishing.

      • scaramobo@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        in 4 days

        Elon should really pilot the next starship himself. Just put a small 1 person capsule on top (or maybe even 5 people so he can take some of his billionaire friends along) and connect a playstation controller to the engines. Stockton did it, and he made several succesful trips. What you do yourself, you do better!!

  • wpb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    in 4 days

    It’s not perfect, but capitalism is the best system we’ve got. It is only through competition on the free market that we would arrive at a space program this efficient and innovative. Imagine if the government tried to do this! They would’ve blown up a 100 rockets by now with nothing to show for it, and it would’ve cost tax payers billions of dollars. The innovation of SpaceX is humanity at it’s finest. For thousands of years we’ve looked up at the sky, and wondered what’s there, and now, thanks to the engineering chops of Elon Musk, it is within our grasp. Imagine that, sending a person to space. Maybe someday we’ll even be able to put someone on the moon!

  • Sal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    in 3 days

    People really put the faith of the entire American space program on Elon. It would be funny if it wasn’t so stupid.

    • weew@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      in 3 days

      It’s less that people are putting faith in Elon (sure, some fanatics might be), but it’s that everyone else is somehow even worse.

      SpaceX is actually getting stuff to space, despite their prototypes blowing up. Hell, even if this Starship thing is a complete failure and never works, their existing rocket, the Falcon, is still far beyond any of the competition.

      The SLS: $10 Billion and a decade late to develop a ship that recycles old Space shuttle parts, then costs $2-3 Billion per launch, and maybe can only launch one every 2 years.

      ULA Vulcan: currently years late, still finding problems, and even after all that gets worked out, it can maybe do 6 launches a year?

      SpaceX: 1-2 launches per week.

      That’s not faith, that’s just facts. I would absolutely love to have somebody else step up and take SpaceX’s crown, but… there really isn’t anybody. Bezos’s Blue Origin may have the biggest chance, but they are more likely to act like ULA than SpaceX.

      • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        in 4 days

        Let my try and distill that. SpaceX is capable of doing some good work, when Elon leaves them alone.

        Remember, Starship is Elon’s napkin drawing idea of making a big cheap steel tube. Bigger and bader than everyone else! For a mission that doesn’t exist, which it’s not even designed properly for. Starship is 100% Elon’s blunder and he’s made so many insane promises for it that it’s dragging SpaceX down.

        Starship is SpaceX’s Cybertruck.

      • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        in 4 days

        Bezos seems pretty happy with space tourism he doesn’t wanna work for the government. Gotta kinda be sick to want to in the first place.

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      in 3 days

      Falcon 9 has launched over 500 mission with a very high success rate. Of course the bulk of advancement should be coming from NASA and we need to spend more there, but SpaceX is putting up big numbers in successful payload lifts.

    • Lembot_0003@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      in 3 days

      Boeing and someone else are trying too. Way behind Space X. So no, not “entire space program”…

      • Sxan@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        in 3 days

        Fuck all commercial dependency. Fully fund NASA, and let them like what they did back in the 60s, which no company could have done.

        Stop relying on corporations to lead our space programs. It’s too important to leave to grifters and corner cutters.

        • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          in 3 days

          NASA has always been dependent on commercial for profit entities as contractors. The Space Shuttle was developed by Rockwell International (which was later acquired by Boeing). The Apollo Program relied heavily on Boeing, Douglas Aircraft (which later merged into McDonnell Douglas, and then merged with Boeing), and North American Aviation (which later became Rockwell and was acquired by Boeing), and IBM. Lots of cutting edge stuff in that era happened from government contracts throwing money at private corporations.

          That’s the whole military industrial complex Eisenhower was talking about.

          The only difference with today is that space companies have other customers to choose from, not just NASA (or the Air Force/Space Force).

          • Sxan@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            in 3 days

            NASA ran the projects. They have specifications to contractors for manufacturing. That’s a far cry from farming out the entire process and renting space on a commercial rocket.

            • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              in 4 days

              NASA funded SpaceX based on hitting milestones on their COTS program. Those were just as available to Boeing and Blue Origin, but they had less success meeting those milestones and making a profit under fixed price contracts (as opposed to the traditional cost plus contracts). It’s still NASA-defined standards, only with an offloading of the risk and uncertainty onto the private contractors, which was great for SpaceX and terrible for Boeing.

              But ultimately it’s still just contracting.

      • Warehouse@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        in 3 days

        If Starship wasn’t constantly exploding you might have a point. Seems as though that the reality is that they’re all pretty much at the same spot but Elon wants to pretend that they aren’t.

  • oyzmo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    edit-2
    in 3 days

    I think Honda has begun building spaceships/rockets too. Think they chose to build the type that don’t explode. link

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        in 4 days

        Japanese cars are superior to American cars

        I had a high school friend who went on to become an engineer at General Motors. One of his first projects for them was tearing down an Infiniti and a Lexus when those cars first came on the market. He said that at the time, GM cars typically had between 300 and 400 production defects of varying severity. When they took apart the Infiniti, they found 2 production defects; when they took apart the Lexus, they found 0.

        • Geodad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          in 4 days

          I worked on the Lexus line in Georgetown, KY one summer between semesters. Their standards are insane. Worked the Toyota Camry line the summer before that.

          On the Camry line, if they found a defect, they would correct it, then have a QC stand there and inspect every affected car for the next month.

          I stood on the line with a screwdriver to check the tightness of a single screw on every sunroof in Camrys. It was so heavily coriographed, it was like a dance.

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        in 4 days

        Definitely agreed on cars, but Japan’s last few moon missions had several catastrophic failures unfortunately.

        • Geodad@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          in 4 days

          I’ll have to read up on that. I didn’t know they had tried anything because of the whole can’t make missiles thing.

    • Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      in 3 days

      We shouldn’t be building rockets PERIOD. They cost too much and are eventually only going to serve trillionaires.

      FIX SHIT ON THE GROUND FIRST

      That said,

      They did a test from 300 meters, sure it’s cool but I think they have a LONG way to go before they are competetive.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        in 3 days

        If you like SatNav, accurate weather tracking, and advanced intercontinental communication then ya like rockets ya dipshit.

        While Id be the first to ban private rocket launches outright, we shouldn’t abandon the advances of the space age because of them.

        • gazter@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          in 4 days

          You’ve got good points, but your needless insults makes your argument fall on deaf ears.

          • mycodesucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            in 4 days

            Separating the message from the messenger is a key skill. A right answer doesn’t become wrong because it comes from a jerk.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              in 4 days

              Yep me being an uncouth asshole has little to no bearing on my point. It’s like those uppity cunts who act like theyre better just cause they don’t swear, usually they are morons I mean Mormons and thusly my inbuilt snob filter works wonders.

              • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                in 4 days

                Hey there I didn’t complain or downvote but also declined to upvote cuz of the two little tiny words of ad hom……

                … (idea!) …

                DINGUS! Dingus would’ve saved it!

                ya dingus

                Perfect, feels very Lemmy-appropriate—gets the insult with a perfect lulz factor so even the parent commenter could’ve kinda laughed (I hope ppl can take jokes!)

                …sorry I know I’m not your mom, hope this doesn’t come across maximally prescriptive (just my 2c!)

                • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  in 4 days

                  I ain’t using dingus firstly cause I’m pretty sure dankpods has a copyright on it and secondarily it has none of the gutteral bite that damned near every other insult in my dialect has. Also I go out of my way to commit some level of ad hom since I find that it’s a fine way to figure out if folks have thick enough skin to take seriously, worst case scenario they throw a punch and that’s just a good time for me.

              • gazter@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                in 4 days

                Agreed, but your point will usually be a lot better received if you aren’t a dick. SpaceX is a great example- it’s a great company, but the head of the company taints the whole thing they are trying to achieve.

                It comes down to respect. Even if I’m wrong, treating me with respect will mean I’m more likely to respect you, and if I respect you I’m going to respect your argument.

            • gazter@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              in 4 days

              You’re absolutely right, you absolute fuckwad, and well said, even if you are a shit eating waste of a human.

              (Sorry I don’t mean it, I feel bad now…)

      • Squirrelanna@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        in 4 days

        We can do both? What’s a rocket scientist going to do about systemic oppression and the rise of fascism that excludes them from working on rockets still?

      • gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        in 4 days

        the thing is, when you build rockets, and they actually work, and put people on mars, you can reasonably demand that people who demand exponential growth actually go to mars, because earth is already full. this way, you can get rid of the billionaires.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      in 4 days

      I mean… its a big deal if you’re anywhere near the launchpad. Or, in or around South Padre Island.

      Also can’t help but notice that Starbase, Texas is practically hugging the US/Mexico border. Almost as though Abbott didn’t want this shit landing in his own backyard when it failed.

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        in 4 days

        It also helps to be as far south as possible. You get to use more momentum to help get orbit, if I understand it correctly.

        IIRC, that’s why NASA launches from Florida. That and the coast making launch failures safer.

        (But I am not a physicist.)

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          in 4 days

          Proximity to the equator and high elevation make for ideal launch sites. Then eastward facing, because you want to run counter to the earth’s spin as you launch and be out over open water if something fucks up. One reason why Kenya, Brazil, and Indonesia were floated as a high efficiency international spaceports decades ago, when efficiency was considered more important than inflating a billionaire’s ego.

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      in 4 days

      I feel bad for all the engineers etc who are working really hard on these projects, only to see their efforts tarnished by the flyblown image of the wanker who owns the company.

  • OCATMBBL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    in 4 days

    How many times does this gotta happen before we start calling them missiles instead of rockets?

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      in 4 days

      I hate the guy’s guts as much as anybody else, but he has kickstarted a space race, and an EV market. Credit where it’s due.

      And yeah I know, rich daddy, no inventions, all evolutionary, etc. But here we are.

      • Siresly@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        in 4 days

        You do not hate the guy’s guts as much as anybody else, or as much as is reasonable. You do not in fact have to give it to the Nazi scum. Any success or credit is due to the employees of the companies the inept pathetic narcissistic pro-fascism scumfuck is undeservedly running, often on fire and into the ground. If the resources he’s hoarding would be allocated by a reasonable, competent and humanist entity, we would all be much better off. Musk would be better off the planet. Shame that he missed this flight.

        • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          in 4 days

          Many miss that Musk’s companies don’t have any measure of success because of him, but instead have it despite him. A lot of intelligent people work for SpaceX and Tesla. Imagine what they could and would do if they didn’t have a petulant man-baby constantly interfering.

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        in 4 days

        What space race?

        NASA us working on a shoestring budget and managed to run some very successful missions. The Artemis Program is/was very succesful, and what does NASA get?

        Budget cuts. Money diverted to SpaceX who, under Elon, has yet to do a single succesful mission (the Dragon capsule and reusable rockets were both projects that Elon bought. Starship is the first project that Elon directed).

        • witx@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          in 4 days

          Are you out of your mind? SpaceX didn’t buy a single thing, they developed and tested existing ideas (the reusability at least). I mean the guy is a total douche and Nazi but why spread these lies about SpaceX? I agree though that America’s future in space shouldn’t rely on SpaceX due to their affinity to a Nazi, and more funding should be given to NASA and other commercial endeavours

          This forum seems like Reddit sometimes but on the other end of the political spectrum

          • Auli@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            in 4 days

            The US should not rely on private companies for stuff. It’s just insane to think it has come to America begging a person for global internet and to get into Space.

        • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          in 4 days

          He didn’t invent EVs, nor batteries, nor rockets, not even vertically landing rockets, but perfected and especially turned them onto massive success. Too bad he went full idiot.

          • dustyData@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            in 4 days

            Perfected

            Press X to doubt

            Making something popular via a lot of lying and false marketing is not something I would’ve thought to read as perfected.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    in 4 days

    If you told me that I’d be cheering for space rockets exploding 10 years ago I would have called you crazy. Incredible how much damage that fiend has done to our society.

    • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      in 4 days

      It’s incredible, isn’t it? I used to be so stoked on space exploration and all the science that goes with it. Still am, really, but my enthusiasm has cooled markedly once billionaires started throwing dick-shaped space missiles around for no other reason than being able to.

        • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          in 4 days

          so European nazis are better than African immigrant nazis?

          did we just create a new layer of racism?

          • bieren@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            in 4 days

            I think we did. But when it comes to Elon musk, he deserves a special kind of racism.

            • Anomalocaris@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              in 4 days

              I’m racist against billionaires.

              you might say being a billionaire isn’t a race, but given that race science is 100% bs, I say why not?

  • drhodl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    in 3 days

    I’m all for mankind colonizing the stars, but I don’t want that A hole down a K hole Elmo involved in any way. I don’t trust the cunt not to have a back door into the colony, that he opens whenever his fee fee’s get hurt, or if his K hole runs dry.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    in 4 days

    It’s getting more efficient by the day. They used to have to launch it into the air before it had blow up. This way it saves time