Sure, if you designed a poll like you describe, it would have problems. But there are well studied ways of designing polls so the result is truly representative. There’s a whole science of this, and professional polls done in good faith will be designed to avoid these kinds of issues.
It way more than half.
How do you know?
There’s always a good percentage that are indifferent or “don’t know”. But they’re no help.
These are some depressing numbers.
47% of U.S. adults disapprove of of deploying the Marines to LA, with 34% approval.
45% disapprove the National Guard deployment, while 38% said they approve.
… An equal share — 45% — also disapprove of the protests against ICE, per Monday YouGov polling.
36% said they approve of the protests, and 19% said they are not sure.
58% of Democrats said they approved of the anti-ICE protests, compared to 15% of Republicans.
They’re simply the party of everything harmful.
In the case of that Australian journalist there’s no question: you can see the policeman carefully aim at her and fire. It’s right there in the video.
Yeah, and this particular vulnerability is pretty obvious for even a moderately experienced developer. You’d really have to be pasting without thinking to let this one slip by.
That’s the point though: LLMs recycle junk information, including some potentially dangerous information, without any indication of the context. In a regular search of the web or of Stack Overflow, you’d probably see people commenting on how the code is vulnerable, but when you ask an LLM it doesn’t necessarily communicate that while still delivering the code.
I am listening to the first episode now.
I’ll listen to it. I was particularly asking what the “child molester enabler” claim referred to. Maybe I’ll find out by listening to several hours of podcasts, but I wondered whether there’s a quicker answer.
Not in general. Something deterred them here - probably the public scrutiny.
What are you referring to? I searched but didn’t find anything.
Is there no evil idea these guys don’t love?
Against what? No one is vaccinated against the next pandemic, and RFK is making sure Americans never will be.
Except it won’t be natural. It will be selection by wealth, since richer people can afford to eat better, keep more active, be less stressed, and get healthcare others can’t access. Poor people are more vulnerable but not because of some natural disadvantage.
If bird flu kicks off, it may be tens or hundreds of millions of dead Americans to come.
There’s that problem, plus the problem that the current crop of old white men are also Nazis.
I suppose it’s an interesting experiment, but it’s not that surprising that a word prediction machine can’t play chess.
The same people who do everything they can to obstruct actual science, including research into vaccines and other medicines. ChatGPT can surely do what actual scientists and experienced health professionals can do. After all, ChatGPT can predict what word a person is likely to say next, so do a convincing impression of someone who knows about medicine. It’s probably no coincidence that many of these people are grifters in their own right, and those who aren’t are suckers for grifters. They have basic problems appreciating the difference between real and fake.