• jpeps@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not American and maybe I’m just OOTL but this confuses me as well… I’m aware of a peaceful protest against the mass deportations, but what else? Why do they need armed soldiers??

        • OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          It’s the next step in his takeover. He already controls the government. He controls business through tariffs. Now he needs to control the people.

          Once he’s got control internally, he’ll turn his eyes to other countries. What we’ve seen so far with his threats will become reality as he annexes Canada, Mexico, and Greenland to secure natural resources and wages a full economic war on anyone else who challenges him (China, EU)

          It’s pretty textbook rise of Nazi Germany 1930s. None of this should be surprising.

          • Mailloche@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yeh as a Canadian I’m pretty sure we’re next after he crushes the democratic states. Can’t build an empire without conqueting your neighbours.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    They should refuse the orders and arrest Trump and everyone else involved in this shit. Which includes a lot of the administration.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Traitor president.

    The sooner Americans learn to accept this is the historical event currently unfolding, the sooner we can take care of him and his enablers.

  • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    I keep seeing people talking about the Marines and the National Guard being deployed, and this is certainly egregious and the blame for it rests squarely on Trump’s head… But I have not seen many people mention that the LAPD are not being deployed by Trump. They are being deployed by Californian Politicians, and from the livestreams and videos I’ve seen, the police are the ones shooting LTL rounds and flahsbangs at civilians and reporters. Let’s not lose sight of the fact that the police response has been unacceptably violent, national guard or not. It is the violence from the police that has historically, and will in this instance as well escalate the situation.

    • anachrohack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I think LAPD are essentially their own political institution, barely accountable to civilian or elected leadership

  • Ileftreddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    2 days ago

    The president deploying the national guard, let alone the fucking MARINES, to “assist police” is a direct violation of the posse comitatus act, which was written to SPECIFICALLY PREVENT ANY PRESIDENT from using the military as law enforcement

    • Lka1988@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 day ago

      Trump has been using the Constitution as toilet paper with zero consequences. Why do you think he cares about this?

      • helvetpuli@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        We know who is really behind this stuff: Russell Vought.

        The remaining question is: how to make it look like a suicide?

      • LordGimp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is what so many people fail to understand.

        When your boss steals $100 from your paycheck, you’re supposed to file a wage claim, wait years for your day in court, and even when you show that the company stole from you, the punishment for them is a small fine ($50 per person first time, $100 per person every time after that). You don’t even get the fine. The fine is paid to the state.

        Now flip it around and imagine what happens when you steal $100 from the company. Immediate legal repercussions, multiple court dates, probation if you’re lucky and jail if you’re not.

        The entire system is designed to fuck people as hard as possible while reserving the kid gloves for corporations and oligarchs.

        I am gleefully awaiting the day protesters start disappearing federal agents/national guard. Fuck all fascists, even the ones “just following orders”. No habeas corpus is a two way street motherfuckers

      • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, it actually does matter this time around. I think this is going to come back to Trump if we make it through long enough. California doesn’t fuck around.

  • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    2 days ago

    Every military and law enforcement member needs to understand right now that attacking protesters for exercising their First Amendment rights is crossing a line that they can never come back from. I, for one, will always hold it against any MAGA for the rest of my life. They deserve to be mercilessly shunned, ridiculed, and discriminated against for the rest of their miserable, stupid, treasonous lives. I own a business, and I will never hire a MAGA supporter, ever.

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I’ll add to this do not go on vacation to any red state. Do not buy goods from red states whenever possible

  • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Trump left his tinydick phylactery in Los Angeles and sent the people who would have been correctly convicted at the Nuremberg Trials to try to find it, but he has to keep sending more because it is so small.

  • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    2 days ago

    This took less than 3 days.

    Less than 3 days of mild protest in one city and Trump is saying the governor needs to be arrested and is using the military against civilians.

    This wasn’t even classed as a riot.

  • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Silver Lining: Media coverage of the extensive protests in every city in America has been so light, that some people are asking why nobody is doing anything. Meanwhile Millions of people are protesting across America. Some protests have been higher than 5 million nationally, and they are growing. At 12 million, we reach 3.5%, which experts say is the threshold for a “tipping point,” which leads to trends like revolutions.

    But since the media isn’t covering it, most people have no idea how much is happening. That is, until HitlerPig and The MAGA Morons hit the stage and start puking all over everybody. THAT makes the news, and now EVERYBODY knows about the protests.

    Somebody should explain the Streisand Effect to these jokers.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Two books:

        Mark Penn’s Microtrends: The Small Forces Behind Tomorrow’s Big Changes

        Malcolm Gladwell’s Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference

        I especially like Gladwell’s book, and his other books as well. Blink is another favorite of mine. I haven’t read Penn’s book in a long time, it may be getting a little dated.

        • insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I read Gladwell already, which has its issues but taking at face value with a pinch of salt is good. I’ll check out the other one, thanks!

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Don’t worry. All the heroic men and women in the armed services will decide THIS oppression of a civilian populace is too much and some of the officers will resign. Then, in just a decade or so, they’ll have O-5s who are only qualified to be O-3s and it will all come crashing down! And if you disagree, you are just a doomer!

      Yeah… This does not end well in any conceivable way.

  • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    Did Trump declare martial law while I was asleep? Because last time I checked, he can’t deploy the military on US soil unless the country is in a state of emergency. And peaceful protests don’t count.

    • Owl@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      since when does it matter what the law says? he’s been breaking the law every single day since he took office. nobody is gonna intervene.

      • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Almost everything Trump has attempted to do, has to some extent, been blocked in the courts. Sometimes temporarily…other times completely. And the temporary blocks are all still active cases, that stand a good chance of getting permanently blocked in the future.

        The problem is, the media isn’t covering that enough. They like the drama…so, all they report in is the shit that gets clicks. And boring court details don’t attract a lot of interest. Especially considering that by the time anything is resolved, the news steam has long since moved on to other, more recent scandals.

        • Wahots@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          The people can’t do much against an MQ-9 reaper, much less strategic bombers that can fly well higher than civilian aircraft.

          If it comes to something like Red Dawn, we are fucked.

          • Soggy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            “The people” aren’t going to engage in traditional warfare against the undivided might of the US military. If there is armed resistence it’s going to be attacks on individuals and sabotage/explosives, and it’s going to divide the armed forces.

      • P1nkman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well, he IS the king of America (and Canada, Panama and Greenland), so why would he need approval?

      • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        The people setting those fires should absolutely be charged for their actions. But their actions don’t negate the Constitutional rights of everyone else who is protesting. And calling in the National guard before the local authorities have declared the situation to be out of their control, is a direct violation of Constitutional law.

          • Archangel1313@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 days ago

            But, when you say, “they”…you are painting the entire protest as violent, unless you make the distinction that it isn’t. And the vast majority of protestors are simply exercising their 1st amendment rights, in a perfectly legal manner.

            • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              I never said they were violent, I haven’t heard of anything violent (edit: from the protesters) yet personally. There’s a difference between peaceful, not peaceful, and violent.

              If there’s enough bad actors doing things like setting cars on fire, then it warrants a larger police presence (but not the national guard at this level or ever the military)

              Edit: Just to add clarity, it warrants a larger police presence, because they are in fact no longer peaceful. Sure most people are, but the protest itself isn’t.

      • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Waymo’s are ultimately used for surveillance to intimidate protesters. Ideally they wouldn’t get burned, but at this point they have chosen to side with authoritarians (tho that is expected of corporations)

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I’d love to see proof that Waymo is providing live footage to the police to help manage the protests if you have it. That’s pretty fucked up if true. (edit: Burning is still bad, but I’d be down for defacing (e.g throwing paint on it) if so.)

          • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            An example

            Granted, this is not about the protest, and it is too early for that footage to be used so far. Still we know the current admin is not happy about any protest and was elected on themes of revenge. It is worth taking steps to protect protesters from being targeted in the coming days and weeks.

            • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I think it comes down to did waymo freely provide it (article doesn’t say up to where it wants me to sign up) or did the police have a warrant.

              If they have a warrant, I think that’s legitimate. I don’t think Waymo should be responding to police requests without a warrant though, otherwise it will breed distrust, and rightfully so.

              The police have been known to demand footage from Tesla’s in the area of crimes as well, again as long as its with a warrant, or the individual owner decides to provide it, I think that’s fine. I want to make the distinction that if an owner of a car that has cameras wants to provide it, i think that’s okay, but as a corporation, with a fleet of vehicles, that should never happen without a warrant.

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        Impressive how the troll farms always manage to put one “yeah people were hurt but what about property?!” in every thread about our pigs.