

So the jury found him guilty but it doesn’t sound like the judge is convinced of his guilt, or at least it sounds like theres little viable evidence that he’s associated with the robbers. What other reconnaissance could he have done that would make him guilty? How is using a toilet for it’s intended purpose reconnaissance? So many questions!
I wonder where standard and splendid fit on the shitoscale. Perfection has to be where you’ve been waiting ages and you finally log out and you feel about 50kg lighter, and only requires a single wipe.
I’ll let someone else have the fun of describing the other end of the scale…