• scoobford@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    No. Imagining an independent future for any state (including California and Texas) is pure cope. The states are so interdependent that attempting to secede would be ruinous for the state in question.

    The only exceptions I can think of are Alaska and Hawaii, which might be able to survive if they found another country to keep them supplied and economically connected.

  • pleasegoaway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I like the idea of it, but California is a cash cow and the US would never let that cash cow get away.

  • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    What you are proposing would start a North American war deadlier than any that has ever been seen. Everyone thought Texas was dumb for talking about secession, but now that other states don’t want to be part of the union, people act like it is a serious idea. It isn’t. Never has been.

    In the words of Ben Franklin, “we must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.”

    • psychadlligoat@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Everyone knew Texas talking about it was dumb because they’re not self sufficient

      California actually is, and if we’re hated by the rest of the country anyway, we’ll just go ahead and leave. Let the rest states have fun paying for shit without us

      • WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Define self sufficient.

        California is not self sufficient in my opinion. They may have a lot of money, but they rely heavily on interstate commerce and trade routes for their prosperity. Taxes and cost of living are already high, and those things would explode if cut off from trade. The federal government won’t hesitate to use their leverage to keep other countries from supporting the newly declared independence of California.

        Texas is not self sufficient either, but I’m not advocating for their secession.

        Put simply, we need fewer borders, not more of them. Any state that thinks they can take their money and run will find themselves brutalized by the federal government, taxed to oblivion by neighboring states, and experiencing an exodus of companies who are based there. It is the path to destruction, not liberation.

    • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      plus there is the bonus of schadenfreunde, since they always want to balkanize countries that happen to stand in their path.

  • VampirePenguin@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    No. We’d be overrun by federal troops and decimated within a week. If we could secede peacefully? We (Wisconsin) would probably need an alliance with Minnesota and Michigan to survive.

  • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 hours ago

    If the Union completely dissolved and each state had to function as nation, it would be a massive boom for the oligarchs. They already have more money than most states.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I imagine they’d form blocs, on centred on California obviously, one on the other coast, and a few in between

  • Triasha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If just my state left, and I could leave to another state, that would be pretty good. Two Republican senators gone, roughly 15 net house reps gone, and an influx of dem refugees like me into neighboring states.

    Texas could legit try to make a go of it as an independent nation. It would be a disaster for my family though.

  • PTSDwarrior@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Yes. In fact, I’ve decided to take a leap of faith and join the California National Party, which you can all check out here: CNP website. I am sick of the usual Republicans vs Democrats. Everytime one party is in power, we are constantly worrying about the loss of civil and human rights. Lets start with a clean slate. If you are a California resident, at least check out their party platform. Also, in 2026, there will be a gubernatorial candidate for CNP. His name is Sean Forbes.

      • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        but mexico has got way more parties than pri, so much that most candidates winning elections do so with a broad alliance. in fact since 2000 pri only had a single term.

      • PTSDwarrior@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’m not sure where you got that we only want one party in an independent California? Once CNP successfully fights for independence, then other parties can spring up. For example, in South Africa, the African National Congress were the big fighters against apartheid. No they are just another (corrupt) political party. Another example is the Indian National Congress. Members of that party fought for independence from the UK. Now, its just another political party, and they have not had any sort of power since 2014. CNP would have a place in an independent California. But the future after that, up in the air.

  • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Washingtonian here, I’ve been saying this should happen for like 8 years now lmao

    The marriage isn’t working. Let it go.

    • wolfinthewoods@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      20 hours ago

      We have had a name for it for awhile, my fellow Washingtonians call the Washington/Oregon/California union ‘Cascadia’. Wouldn’t be such a bad idea.

      • invertedspear@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        If you don’t take AZ and NV with you, you will get your Colorado River water cut off and lose a lot of farming power. That might even require UT. Unless it’s only Northern California included, in which case you still lose that agriculture, and possible land based trade lines to Mexico. It’s not a clean and pretty separation.

        • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          That is a problem, but not an intractable one. The first easy win would be to just stop wasting so much water. CA could be a lot more careful with water than it is by just leaning on industry and ag to cut wasteful water use harder than it leans on the suburbs. Don’t get me wrong, green lawns in our Mediterranean climate are a stupid waste too, but it pencils out to less than a percent of all water use, where ag and industry are both in the double digits.

      • -☆-@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Fuck yeah! Cascadia! Let us stop funding this awful government and actually put our taxes towards improving people’s lives

      • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Absolutely, and I’m about ready to start identifying as that over American 🫠.

        I usually think of BC being part of it, too, cause we’re so similar culturally, and we hang out on each other’s side of the made up invisible line all the time.

        One can dream!