Because they have a predatory business model.

Usually what happens is people create lambda functions on AWS which are basically managed functions that get invoked when a request comes in (think a modern version of CGI), and then if there are a lot of requests then the user can easily end up with a huge bill.

I find the most relevant aspect of an estimate is how familiar the person making the estimate with the problem. People who have the best understanding will inevitably give the best estimates.

I literally explained all this to you in detail already. You’re like a chat bot spewing nonsense that is grammatically correct, but lacks any actual meaning upon closer examination.

The point is they haven’t even tried doing this. But you keep on braying here pretending like you have clue. It’s adorable.

🤣

Google exists, spend some time educating yourself if you genuinely care about understanding the subject. If you’d like me to tutor you, then feel free to send a dm and pay me for the effort.

So you’re admitting that you have no clue how the US legal system works?

basically, don’t ever install meta apps on any of your devices and use a browser that has good tab isolation, always use Firefox would be my advice

Genetic algorithms use a fitness function to converge on a solution, so it’s not just random iterations hoping one will work. It’s basically a gradient descent algorithm applied to output from LLMs.

The Congress has WAY more tools than just impeachment to check illegal executive actions. Impeachment’s the nuclear option, but daily oversight is where real accountability happens. Let’s just take a look at a few tools dems could use.

Trump admin officials like Wilbur Ross repeatedly ignored subpoenas about the citizenship census question. Dems could’ve jailed officials for contempt ,like the GOP did to Lois Lerner, or sued for enforcement. They folded. Trump’s family separation policy violated asylum laws. Congress controls the purse. They could’ve defunded ICE/CBP’s ability to implement it. Instead, they funded it more. Trump’s emoluments violations (e.g., foreign govs. paying at his hotels). Pass a bill explicitly banning presidential self-enrichment. When Dems did act (e.g., suing over border wall funds), they won which proves that legal avenues exist.

Claiming “Congress can’t do anything” ignores history. When Bush pushed torture, Congress passed the Detainee Treatment Act. When Obama overreached on immigration, courts blocked him. Weakness is a choice, not a constraint. Even without majority control, minority parties have real power, which dems are not using. They can force subpoena votes, sue in court (like Dems did to block Trump’s border wall funding), leverage Senate filibusters, and rally public pressure. Republicans proved this by stonewalling Obama’s Supreme Court pick for 10 months with only Senate control. The tools exist, and the lack of oversight reflects political opportunism as opposed to institutional impossibility.

I’ve never touched ChatGPT out of principle, but everything I hear about it makes it sound like hot garbage.

^ this is what sniffing glue does to your brain kids

My experience is that you want to keep changes as focused as possible. The smaller the context it has to work on the better the results tend to be, and the easier it is to check that it did what you actually wanted it to.

here’s what DeepSeek gave me for the following prompt: write a small bash script to check if a CSV exists and if it does rename to the filename_date.CSV and upload to hdfs, keep it simple

#!/bin/bash

# Check if filename argument is provided
if [ $# -eq 0 ]; then
    echo "Usage: $0 <csv_filename>"
    exit 1
fi

CSV_FILE="$1"

# Check if file exists
if [ ! -f "$CSV_FILE" ]; then
    echo "Error: File $CSV_FILE not found!"
    exit 1
fi

# Generate new filename with date (YYYYMMDD format)
DATE=$(date +%Y%m%d)
NEW_FILENAME="${CSV_FILE%.*}_${DATE}.csv"

# Rename the file
mv "$CSV_FILE" "$NEW_FILENAME"

# Upload to HDFS
hdfs dfs -put "$NEW_FILENAME" /path/to/hdfs/directory/

echo "Successfully processed: $NEW_FILENAME"

Not just OpenEvolve, I’m talking about how agents can use MCP to run code now. Cursor can now have agents iterate on a solution completely on their own.

Nowadays, the agents can iterate. It basically works like a genetic algorithm where it converges on a solution.

I’ve had pretty good success with DeepSeek making decent bash scripts. What was the script out of curiosity, I can try and see what DeepSeek spits out.