I’m not. Geo-engineering is geo-engineering.

Please quote the text of the law that makes you think this is regulating chemtrails.

LoL. You think warrantless surveillance is just a Trump thing?

‘Stop repeating unflattering facts about Democrats! 😭’

If you only oppose authoritarianism under Republicans, you don’t oppose fascism. You just prefer a flavor of it.

This just in: a hammer makes a poor screwdriver.

Tim Walz, her running mate, sent the national guard in to attack BLM protesters. This is a problem with both parties.

Oh yeah. Zero chance of it happening while the capitalists remain in charge.

Even prior to the patriot act, they were just surveilling illegally. US intelligence worked with ATT to install illegal mass wiretaps at all of their comms centers.

We really need a law explicitly banning the third-party doctrine loophole to get around the fourth amendment.

I’m speaking to the purported “law and order” they claim to enforce. It’s just a fabrication to justify their authority.

It implies an adherence to law that I’ve never seen in my lifetime, from neither domestic law enforcement nor foreign deployed military. It should be a factor, but I’ve never seen it in practice.

Actually, you’re out of your depth, and I think you’ve been outed enough. We’re done, and I’m blocking.

No, I’m not gonna dox myself.

Reasoning for what? What details are you needing for clarification?

Studio Ghibli does not have exclusive rights to their style- whether it’s used by a person or an AI to inspire a new image. Those are derivative works. Totally legal. Arguably ethical. If it’s not a direct copy, how has the studio been harmed? What work of theirs was diminished?

I’m advocating for tools. How people use those tools is on them.

I’m not evangelizing. You incorrectly stated the limitations and development paths of the tech, and I corrected you.

Again with the religious verbiage from you. But I’m the one proselytizing?

It’s not nothing- it’s an impressive feat of technology that’s still in its infancy. It’s also not everything, and not anywhere close to a reasoning mind at this point. You are obsessive with extremes.

People have been presenting the work of others as their own for all of history. All that changed was a new tool was found to do that. But at least these are a form of derivative works, and not just putting their name directly on someone else’s carbon copy.

That it has to be nothing or everything with you, decision trees or God himself, is the likely foundation of your inability to have simple objective take on the existing technology and its capabilities. It’s giving bi-polar.

Now I’m not uninformed- I’m too informed!! LoL. That goalpost just shifted right across the field, and still you cannot admit to your ignorance.

No one told you to hand it over. A technology being able to do something does not require you to use it. And people misusing the technology to feign talent is a reflection of the people- not the tech.

I’m not talking about neural interfaces. I’m talking about organiod intelligence.

I am a computer scientist with lab experience in this. I’m not pulling this out of my ass. I’m drawing from direct experience in development.

And there’s the reveal!! That’s why it’s so personal for you! It’s a career threat. It all adds up now.

I call the brain “wetware” because there are companies already working with living neurons to be integrated into AI processing, and it’s an actual industry term.

That you so confidently declare machines will never be capable of processes we haven’t even been able to clearly define ourselves, paired with your almost religious fervor in opposition to its existence, really speaks to where you’re coming from on this. This isn’t coming from an academic perspective. This is clearly personal for you.

Same tactics, same soldiers, same commanders, same weapons, same policies…

What’s different, besides the location? Only difference I see is that the rules of engagement are much stricter for soldiers abroad, while demonically they can fire on anyone they want and attack the press without consequence.