

Maybe this kind of discussion will get more interested people on [email protected] .
Maybe this kind of discussion will get more interested people on [email protected] .
It’s for django, but take a look into my ActivityPub Toolkit. It is designed to be compliant with ActivityPub and not with any particular implementation, so it should be easy for you to adapt to your own needs.
Do we expect every single user to assess all of the toxic communities
No, I want users to have access to a list of pre-curated communities and let them customize it to their liking, like what Fediverser does.
In the same way that defederation is an admin-level decision impacting all of the userbase
Defederation is a bad way to manage conflict. It is a nuclear option that should be taken only when the offending instance (as a whole) is malicious. To stretch this “my server, my rules” philosophy further is bad design.
Good admins are like good janitors. They are not there to enforce behavior top-down.
I forgot that you are selective with your tolerance with hyperbole.
I mean features about customizing behavior (“Trump Musk filter”, “Vote weighting”) and the things where the data is publicly available but hidden only for admins, like “Attitude and Reputation scoring”.
It seems like every single one of those features are just settings that could (and should) be implemented client-side, and left up to the user who wants to have control over their experience.
The menu has a link to the repository.