Clearly I didn’t communicate very well. I was positing that people then to view it as a polar choice. SO if it wasn’t Al Qaida, it must have been Bush… It is the base premise, from a country thinking between two sports clubs at a superbowl, to 2 major parties, to good and evil concepts. When you make certain accusations to certain foreign intelligence agencies (where did I write US foreign intelligence agencies?) then you don’t name them.
Anyway, seeing how you’re a Commission Report apologist who doesn’t understand
- buildings, no matter their construction cannot fall at near free fall speed.
- The Pentagon, even in 2001 was a highly secured building, there were many CCTV angles of the pentagon covering the impact.
- the uncommon nature of a 2 trillion $ going missing EVER, let a lone the day before, let alone the value of that money that day.
And most interestingly, people like you always assume that people who say it certainly wasn’t what the official story says it was, then have to offer a complete fully funded investigation and propose exactly what happened to the random arbitration of your satisfaction. How about they did an actual investigation first? Like a criminal investigation by an impartial 3rd party body?
The reason they got away with it is because the bigger the lie, the more people believe it, and a vast majority of the population is raised so lovingly that that can’t imagine anyone doing such a cowardly, manipulative narcissistic act in order to move a hidden agenda forward.
All the rest isn’t really worth engaging any further in, as you don’t get the basics down, and can’t open yourself up to my hypothesis. I have considered and studied most of yours.
Don’t get me wrong, I would trade that part of my consciousness, as I see lots of people live much simpler and happier lives by believing the official story.
Have a great life man, sounds awesome.
3rd party body you’re referring to was conducted by the same patriotic cult government-in-shock that was just attacked. I meant an international one. No need to start using slurs, makes you look like you can’t win with proper argumentation.
Jet fuel actually can’t melt steel beams, but you know that too, because you’re referring to “engineering lefties who laugh at RBG’s death” and that’s somehow relevant to what I’m saying.
Jet fuel can weaken steel and that can help the collapse, but not at the speed we saw on camera. If you want sources, you can use a search engine. If you like engineers, go find the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth.
Again with the insults of intelligence. You need to work on your reasoning and debating skills.
Even the Reuters fact check calls it misrepresenting, not false. He did say that that day. It didn’t go missing overnight is the “misrepresentation”.
Hypothesis: A close ally of the US attacked the US to coerce them into & drum up public (& international) support for decade long wars to setup more wars so eventually the death cult can have the greater state to control all the holy lands of the middle east.
You may not understand that because you may listen to maniacal laughing engineering podcasts, you don’t understand covert cult power and how these factions have worshipped and warred for their death cult dogmas for centuries. Nor do you seem to grasp how human psychology and mass psychosis works.
You are good at trying to make people ont he internet feel small though. Digital chest bouncing isn’t really a Lemmy thing here, we try to have respectful dialogue. If you can’t do that, Reddit will probably gladly take you back.