

Sure, but if you choose to be reactionary rather than understanding you’ll often be in the wrong. My city has some new bike paths where it’s easy to accidentally wind up walking on the bike paths. We are still in a state where many conflicts are due to infrastructure. Are we trying to build better streets for everyone or are we just gonna shift from cars to cyclists owning the streets? When I bike my first thought after safety is being considerate and understanding, not demanding.
Oh thank god. Please let this actually get cut from the bill (not to say there isn’t plenty more that’s fucked in there.) Also fuck his characterization of what we wouldn’t sell. Makes it sound like no big deal but he conveniently left national forests off that list.