No, it’s sometimes instructive to understand what he’s lying about and why.

It’s just you. There’s been a distinct lack of subtlety in right wing propaganda for a long time, going back at least to “this is extremely dangerous to our democracy.”

Trump to FALSELY CLAIM TO revoke California vehicle emission rules on Thursday

Fucking get it right, headline writers! This shit is pure consent-manufacturing.

Did they, though?

Or are they still just prescient?

He correctly understood the context in which you wrote it, which was defending fascist-accelerationist non-voters and third-party voters.

What do you mean, “always?” Way too many dictators have lived to a ripe old age and died peacefully of natural causes.

Multiple people in the thread are talking about using them because of worries about a kid running out into traffic.

Quit pretending that a statement has to apply 100% of the time in every possible circumstance in order to be generally true.

People are alluding to it, but not attributing the blame correctly: the “need” to leash kids is yet another negative consequence of car-dependent urban design.

So if nobody else is in charge of them, Newsom should take command and order them to go back home.

What the fuck do you think learning vocabulary by reading is, if not memorization? You’re just doing it subconsciously rather than intentionally.

Sometimes I wonder if Firefox actually has low market share, of if this sort of shit just skews the statistics.

I, for one, refuse to spoof my browser because I want them to know Chrome is not as dominant as they think.

Doesn’t help my employer moved me here then reneged on my proposed salary

Look up “promissory estoppel.”

You are incredibly naive if you think they can’t manufacture an excuse no matter how docile we are.

Whatever they choose to do is fuelling his ascension to dictatorship.

Which means the only strategy left (besides capitulation) is to play their game and beat them at it.

It’s not “allegiance to the party;” that’s a fucking lie. It’s understanding of game theory and harm reduction.

Quit your bullshit.

The reason “ACAB” is a thing is that “good cops” pretty quickly either cease to be good or cease to be cops (e.g. Frank Serpico).

That’s why the “a few bad apples” analogy applies: because they spoil the bunch. The whole bunch, without exception.

How rural? I found a Sikh temple north of Santa Fe that could maybe use it for their langar.

Newsom should do more than that; he should order them to stand down and direct the California Bureau of Investigation, California Highway Patrol, or California State Guard to arrest any troops who fail to comply.

There is an implicit assumption here that models are being ‘trained’, perhaps because LLMs are a hot topic. By models we are usually talking about things like decision trees or regression models or Markov models that put in risk probabilities of various eventualities based on patient characteristics.

[Citation needed]

If these things were being based on traditional AI techniques instead of neural network techniques, why are they getting implemented now (when, as you say, LLMs are the hot topic) instead of a decade or so ago when that other stuff was in vogue?

I think the assumption that they’re using training data is a very good one in the absence of evidence to the contrary.

I’d like to know what specific steps are being taken to remove the bias from the training data, then. You cannot just feed the model a big spreadsheet of human decisions up to this point because the current system is itself biased; all you’ll get if you do that is a tool that’s more consistent in applying the same systemic skew.