JackbyDev

“This only applies to the most widely used OS and won’t work without someone clicking grant admin permissions which most people probably do blindly.”

🙄 Ugh

Can’t wait to see the “pro choice” and “pro life” debates about forcibly resurrecting people.

Ew. That’s a lot of focus on highschool. Like I need to write a damn essay about my high school experience just to apply to a job in my 30s? Fuck no. Absolutely not. What a clown show.

You did not say might you said it would.

I just wanted to mention that using some water to wash dishes isn’t wasteful at all. Also a dish washer uses much less water than you’d think.

High school? Please tell me it was entry level or a college internship.

Even then some work! Marvel Rivals works on Linux fine!

So does Helldivers 2 but that’s cooperative.

I’d be concerned that I was brought back to life.

The idea that he might use slave as a slur while understanding he was a free black man isn’t that crazy though.

You’re saying if we didn’t have the Switch we would’ve had the Steam Deck earlier but you’re also saying the Steam Deck is something totally independent of the Switch. But if it was totally independent, why do you think it would’ve come earlier if the Switch didn’t exist? That’s why I’m saying you’re contradicting yourself.

Like what rectangular prism is the best? It really depends on what for. Sometimes wide and flat is better, sometimes tall and narrow is okay. Maybe a cube is nice.

Seeding illegal, leeching legal! This is not advice, be kind and seed!

The third one is hilarious. Like some filter is like “whoa whoa you can’t commit suicide in an image, but shooting your shadow? Deep. Poignant. Mysterious. I’ll allow it.”

How tf is this “coming for Muse”? lol. People are inspired by random things all the time, them making things you don’t like because of it is not besmirching what inspired them.

I don’t get this line of thinking… If you’re using arguments like “you can run past them but it’s safer to kill them so they stop attacking” how does that not apply to BotW/TotK? Obviously some eneny camps you ignore because they’re irrelevant, it is an open world game after all, all open world games are like that (many learned the hard way why you should ignore giants in Skyrim lol). But in areas where you’re trying to accomplish something, you “need” to kill them because they’re attacking. That’s still true.

You can’t say “I dislike the game because it doesn’t give me a reason to kill enemies” while saying “in Doom you don’t need to kill enemies but it’s easier if you do” when BotW/TotK are both easier if you kill enemies. And I know you’re not the one who said it, but you’re changing the context of the conversation.

She had other inspirational music. Like Muse. Who was… Also inspired by 9/11. Fuck.

You only think a game is fun if you’re willing to 100% it?

There’s not a reason to fight most enemies in most video games to be honest. TotK mostly fixed the weapon breaking mechanic in my eyes. They’re much more durable now and last longer when fused (there is generally no reason to not do fusion). The only thing that’s more fun in BotW than TotK is riding a horse through Hyrule field while dodging tons of guardian lasers.

TotK didn’t have real dungeons? Huh? I disagree with that criticism for BotW, but I can at least understand why people say it.

But I’m not gonna get into this. I like them. They’re very popular. A certain vocal subset of the Zelda fandom hate them. A certain vocal subset of the Zelda fandom has hated a lot of more opinionated Zelda games on release only to view them more favorably later. People loathed Wind Waker on release, but now tons of people love it. I think these games will be viewed more favorably by fans long term. Yes, they’re different from the others, but not all of them need to follow the same formula. Variety is the spice of life.

For example, I really enjoyed Link’s Awakening HD.

My entire point is that before they weren’t saying “real” versus “imaginary”. You’re proving my point. In the other fields mentioned you could make the same argument about the interpretation changing but the book still being useful.