- 13 Posts
- 5 Comments
Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.orgOPto Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com•China’s government has announced that people will require IDs to go on the internet. For now this is voluntary, but there are signs it will not remain that way for long.English0·3 days agoYou are a hypocrite and don’t address my comments again. This is waste of time.
Go to these .ml comms before criticising anything here.
Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.orgOPto Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com•China’s government has announced that people will require IDs to go on the internet. For now this is voluntary, but there are signs it will not remain that way for long.English0·3 days agoYou (intentionally?) don’t address what I have written.
In these .ml communities, China is always good with everything banned that is even slightly criticial of Beijing. It doesn’t matter if it’s ‘China’ or ‘Privacy’ or any other topic. If you want Lemmy to ‘succeed’, just start there so that ‘people can here different viewpoints’ also there.
Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.orgOPto Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com•China’s government has announced that people will require IDs to go on the internet. For now this is voluntary, but there are signs it will not remain that way for long.English1·3 days agoIn the Privacy community it is entirely appropriate to criticize China relentlessly. In the China community, it is not.
In these .ml communities, China is always good with everything banned that is even slightly criticial of Beijing. It doesn’t matter if it’s ‘China’ or ‘Privacy’ or any other topic. If you want Lemmy to ‘succeed’, just start there. Here you are already reading unbiased, independent, and high-quality sources.
Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.orgOPto Privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com•China’s government has announced that people will require IDs to go on the internet. For now this is voluntary, but there are signs it will not remain that way for long.English0·3 days agoDon’t worry, ‘comrade,’ there are communities here on Lemmy that are viewing China always positively and block anything that is even slightly critical of China.
Here you read only news based on facts from reliable sources, nothing here is biased. The .ml comms intentionallly spread propaganda and propaganda only. But you are criticizing here, not there. This is hypocritical.
I end this discussion now.