It also had some big gameplay departures from 1 & 2. I’m not talking about being an FPS (although no longer having to worry about accuracy was pretty significant) but the fact that putting on different clothing magically made you more intelligent, and that it was a lot easier to do everything.
In FO3 you can pick all the locks, hack all the computers, pass all the conversation checks, and take on hordes of enemies all by yourself. In FO1+2 you had to pick the couple of things you were good at and not be able to do the other things until your next run.

3. Your opposition has empathy

Out the airlock they go.

Do you reply to memes about video games with your thoughts on covid?

sounds like you haven’t had much experience of having to sit through religious people spout bullshit at you every single day.

You mean like what’s happening in this thread? Someone had a joke that had nothing to do with religion, and here we are talking about religious bullshit because someone can’t let any opportunity pass without mentioning religion.

Again: if you’re tired of people spouting religious bullshit at you all day I would expect you to not try to steer even more conversations towards religion.

I would just expect someone who doesn’t like religion to not want to have conversations about it, instead of bringing it up at every vaguely related opportunity.

No ID saying they are ICE, so they very well could be protestors! You have no way of knowing and feel threatened…

Q: How can you tell if a Lemming is an atheist?

A: Don’t worry, they’ll tell you.

You saw a meme about science and math and your first thought was “how can I make this about religion”?

You want OP to ask someone to correct the grammar on their post before OP posts a screenshot somewhere else?

“If anyone ruins my big boy parade I’m going to throw the biggest tantrum you’ve ever seen!”

why don’t they program them to look up math programs and outsource chess to other programs when they’re asked for that stuff?

Because the AI doesn’t know what it’s being asked, it’s just a algorithm guessing what the next word in a reply is. It has no understanding of what the words mean.

“Why doesn’t the man in the Chinese room just use a calculator for math questions?”

Kinda of actually

I’m reminded of an early model that was trained to find if tanks were hiding pictures of forests / jungles. Was doing great with the training data then was given new images and seemed to be guessing wildly.

Turns out it in the training data all the pictures with tanks were taken on cloudy days.

If you’re just looking for reasons to dislike her then go circlejerk somewhere else

I’m not, but if we look back to the top of this comment chain, we see someone complaining that the comments won’t be about the comic but instead about how shitty a person the artist is for some reason.
We get a reply to that about how she has an OF, and then the comment you replied to:

I fail to understand why posting a pair of tits is such a controversial thing to do. Maybe I’m too European to lose my marbles over some nipples.

So one could be forgiven for assuming your response to that was part of the conversation about why it’s so controversial and the artist being a shitty person.

If you are in fact over here just “trying to talk about Internet security” then it sounds like you’ve taken a bizarre tangent from the topic at hand in order to circle jerk about your topic of choice.

not having 2FA set up as a public celebrity who is constantly being attacked is once again bad OPSEC.

Sure. But that sounds like her problem, not a reason for me to dislike her.

This sounds a lot like “there are duchbags attacking her because they are misogynists” which again, is not a good reason for other people to dislike her.

Yes, everyone should practice OPSEC, but a public “celebrity” who’s sole business is online doubly so.

She doesn’t practice OPSEC because she has an OF that exists? I am not nearly as aware of her OF as the people that don’t like her, so you’ll have to let me know if there’s something different she should be doing with it.

to determine whether friendly actions can be observed by enemy intelligence

I must be really out of the loop. What is her business that results in her having enemy intelligence? Is it being on OF that gets you enemy intelligence, or making comics?

She has children so she has to be a paragon of virtue?