• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 day ago

    “This is a chilling statement,” he told Mother Jones. “Even if it were a joke, it was clearly designed to make the public afraid to exercise its First Amendment rights to protest and to hold government officials, including LAPD officers, accountable for their actions.”

    Fuck this timeline. Resist. They don’t have enough people to get to us all unless we are compliant.

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      1 day ago

      They don’t have enough people to get to us all unless we are compliant.

      This is incorrect. They absolutely have enough people to monitor the feeds for detected people and collect people up individually after the fact, which is exactly what the speakers/statements are alluding to.

      This is why “AI” bullshit is bullshit. This is why cameras on literally every traffic light is bad. This is what a lot of people have been screaming since 9/11. With the TSA and other organizations collecting information all willy nilly.

      • peteyestee@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yeah… There is no such thing as privacy or security. It’s already game over for human rights like that. They need each citizen to be their product in which they can buy sell and profit off.

        The roosters at that cop city place in Georgia said they started getting harassed and followed by the police. The police and feds works the same as street gang pressure. It’s basically legal modern Mafia… In fact they even have used the mafia for themselves.

  • peteyestee@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Remember the government will profile you and harass you until you become the image they profiled you as.

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    It can get cold if you’re protesting at night, so don’t forget to keep warm by wearing a face covering 😊

  • errer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was a juror on a trial where a camera was used to record a purported crime from a helicopter. The camera quality was no joke, I could make out the individual buttons on the guy’s shirt. I don’t doubt they could ID people from the chopper.

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Out of sheer curiosity, what kinds of rounds could feasibly take down a helicopter? Is .50 cal the minimum?

    • Scranulum@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      A few cheap laser pointers from Walmart or the discount store and that thing will either be landing immediately, leaving the AO, or crashing violently.

      But, you know, you should never do this. Or whatever I’m supposed to say here to prevent the secret police from kicking my door in.

      • qarbone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I don’t think there is anything to prevent that. So might as well say as much as you can before they snatched away the mic

    • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Literally anything hits the tail rotor and it’s a spinning brick. .308, a drone, steel cable, Kevlar nets, whatever. Those things are hovering death traps

    • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Nah, just about any rifle round can. It’s a matter of hitting it somewhere important though. Most people can’t hit anything at any meaningful distance. So now you’re going to shoot into the air, miss the helicopter and take out someone a couple miles away as collateral.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not necessarily. If they start taking any small arms fire I expect they’ll leave. 5.56 could crack the windscreen or injure the occupants. A bigger round would be more effective if you actually want to hit the engine or transmission and actually take it down, yes. You could probably do it with anything .300 or larger (7.62 NATO, etc.) if you hit it just right or multiple times. Or yeah go for something big like .50 BMG and hit it once somewhere in the meaty bits. But rifles in .50 are often bigger and more awkward to move around.