That’s not a typo. Windows 96 promised to build on the success of Windows 95, yet it never materialized as originally intended.

I only learned about this a few months ago. To me, this was an incredibly fascinating discovery and wanted to write about & share it.

“The Windows That Never Was”

  • LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is a very good article, but this part peeved me on a petty level (as well as explaining why there’s precious little in the way of screenshots):

    While I can’t find any uploads that are set to run on their website in a virtual computing session, the files are available to download if you felt like spinning up a piece of computing history.

    The opportunity to do a little investigative journalism is right there, and the blog author didn’t take it

    • macstainless@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hi, author here 👋. Thanks for the feedback. If the Internet Archive had it on their own VM to run, I would’ve tried playing with it and taken some screenshots. However, I simply did not have the time to get it running locally on my machine, especially because I’m all Mac and Virtual Box doesn’t run on M-series hardware.

      I agree it’s a missed opportunity, but I chose to go a little bit of an easier route.

      Thanks for reading and enjoying the other 99% of the article. 😉