LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoWho remembers this? piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square478linkfedilinkarrow-up1245arrow-down132
arrow-up1213arrow-down1imageWho remembers this? piefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone to memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square478linkfedilink
minus-squareZagorath@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoThe front of it presumably is. But the back, that we’re looking at, seems to be in shade.
minus-squareagamemnonymous@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoLight bounces around. That’s the whole point of ray tracing. Even if the dress were not in direct light, the light bouncing around the environment would prevent the kind of shade necessary for that.
The front of it presumably is. But the back, that we’re looking at, seems to be in shade.
Light bounces around. That’s the whole point of ray tracing. Even if the dress were not in direct light, the light bouncing around the environment would prevent the kind of shade necessary for that.